The BIM Handbook is a great reference guide for understanding BIM. The passage I read
was a great history of the BIM and discussed how it has evolved over
the years. Knowing the evolution of BIM helps understand the way it
works today. It is a good source for understanding the many
important aspects of BIM, such as families and how its parametric
relationships work. Showing the distinctions and benefits of BIM vs
typical CAD programs also helps understand modern BIM systems. For
example, a seasoned construction worker with a non-programer
background would be able to use BIM software and develop entire
families with minimal computer skills, a feature not typical of
AutoCAD programs.
The main article also discusses the
main problem with exchanging BIM models between platforms. The main
issues involved in the exchange is the different parametric
relationships defined by separate and competing applications. It
suggests that standardization of the data parameters is essential in
the future, but it will only happen incrementally. For example, the
first article, Toward a national BIM standard,
discusses the current push by the American Concrete Institute to
standardize cast-in-place concrete structures. The ACI is working
with the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) and its
buildingSMART alliance (http://www.buildingsmartalliance.org)
to further development in the AEC industry that will minimize data
exchange discrepancies between building management software
applications. The benefits of consistent formatting are evident in
simple tasks such as word processing. How frustrating can it be to
format a powerpoint presentation just to send it through email
between a Mac and a Windows? But in the AEC industry, time is
exponentially more valuable (the interest on multi-million dollar
loans, the high labor costs, late penalties) and any error from
miscommunicated should be avoided at
The second article, From 2D to 3D: moving toward a (green?) national building information modeling standard, also discusses the need for standardization of BIM to create a
National BIM (NBIM) and the role sustainability plays in creating an
accurate BIM model. An accurate building model should represent the
entire life-cycle of the structure, not just the design and
construction phase. The environmental data used would help with
fully model the impacts of all components of the building. Without
accurate data, no model can become reliable.
The advantages of a NBIM would greatly
increase the efficiency of building construction. From design to
demolition, all phases of a building's life cycle will need be
included to make buildings more functional and efficient.
I think the concept of a national BIM standard is interesting, and will be needed soon when BIM plays a bigger role in every building project. Just as there are protocols for 2D drawings, I think the same should be done for BIM modeling in order to create a central model that everything can stem from. Especially when considering the integration of HVAC, acoustic, and other building element modeling, it would be much too difficult to have a variety of programs floating around that aren't compatible. In an industry where integration and input from various companies is becoming more common, a standard for BIM and its components is a great idea.
ReplyDelete