One of the additional articles that I read this week was titled "BIM Interoperability." This article discusses the story of information flow as it travels from the design professionals (read: actual hunam beings) to the BIM system, then to the design and analysis software, to the fabricator, to the contractor, and finally to the owner. At the present time, the workflow of data between the BIM system and the analysis software is currently strangled by the lack of design or analytical capabilities in BIM software. Rather than complete the analysis in BIM software, the design must be exported to a 3rd party design and analysis software, such as RISA 3D, RAM Steel, or SAP2000, through an inefficient exportation process. This process is shown in the following chart:
In the future, hopefully interoperability standards will be more defined, and programs like Revit and Microstation will include analysis tools within the software. This seems to be the direction that Bentley is going in with their latest software.
The other article that I read this week was the National Building Information Modeling Standard, which is produced by the National Institute of Building Sciences. One of the most interesting things I found in this standard is the justification for why a BIM standard is necessary. In this section, the following graph highlights the potential game-changing impact that BIM can have on the construction industry:

Thus, the effects of BIM interoperability are incredibly consequential. Hopefully the industry can adopt standards faster and more efficiently than it has with computer aided design throughout the past three decades.
I really the flow chart in your post. It shows how complex the BIM industry is.
ReplyDelete